Door A — Amazon · appeals
Ask any reinstatement firm why DIY appeals fail and they'll give you the honest answer for free: Amazon's reviewers can spot a generic template immediately. They're right. So this page gives you the structure Amazon itself asks for — and the kit gives you the builder that forces your case into it.
Not "we violated the policy" — the specific failure: which listing, which supplier, which process, which date. Reviewers pass appeals whose root cause matches the evidence Amazon already has. A root cause that contradicts their records ends the review.
What you already did — past tense, with proof attached: listings removed, inventory pulled, supplier dropped, buyers repaid in full. "We will be more careful" is not a corrective action. A dated document is.
The system that makes the failure structurally impossible to repeat: the new sourcing rule, the weekly metric check, the named person who owns it. Specific beats long — three real systems outrank two pages of promises.
A Section 3 appeal is a trust document. An IP appeal is an evidence document (invoices in your name, dated within 180 days, from suppliers who can be verified). A related-account appeal is a proof-of-separation document. A performance appeal is a math document. Writing any of them in another family's shape is the quiet reason good cases fail — the full per-family question sets are the kit's core.
One payment, both doors, yours to keep. We never ask for your login — you submit everything yourself. See everything inside the kit →